Galaxy Towers Condominium Association
MINUTES OF THE MEETING
Of the Board of Directors
January 9, 2003
Directors in Attendance: Absent:
President: Martha Norget
Vice Pres.: Michael Baruch, M.D.
Secretary: Harlin Blank
Treasurer: Allan Ellinger
Directors
Leon Eastmond
Chad Gulrajaney
Robert Johnston
Joel Price
Dennis Squitieri
Also Present:
Susan Fitzpatrick, General Manager
Robert Buckalew, Esq.
Mary Ellen Saks, Comptroller (7:00pm – 7:35pm)
Mr. Jim Stumpf, Chairman, Facilities Committee (arrived 7:30)
Walter T. Gorman and Associates – (7:30-8:15)
JMA Engineering Consultants (8:20-9:00)
A meeting of the Board of Directors was held on January 9, 2003 in accordance with the By-laws of the Association. The following business was conducted as indicated:
Call to Order
Michael Baruch, V.P., acted as Chairperson of the Meeting, because Martha Norget, President was on vacation. He called the meeting to order at 7:10pm. The meeting proceeded to Executive Session:
Open Session
Mr. Baruch called for a motion to approve the minutes as written. On a motion made by Mr. Ellinger and seconded by Mr. Eastmond voted unanimously to approve the minutes.
On a motion made by Allan Ellinger and seconded by Chad Gulrajaney, the Board voted unanimously in favor of allowing committees to carry operating surpluses into succeeding years to be used for committee purposes.
On a motion made by Michael Baruch and seconded by Harlin Blank, the Board voted unanimously to direct Mr. Buckalew to amend the appropriate resolution to allow for a 3rd alternate to sit on the covenants committee. Once the amendment is approved by the Board of Directors, the Chairperson of the Covenants committee will be asked to make his/her recommendation to the Board.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick began a long explanation of the problem that is occurring at the “Giant Planter-Berm” area and the driveway. She stated that the membrane that runs under the driveway is not connected in any way to the membrane that is in the Giant Planters. Because of the fact that these two membranes are not tied together, water is seeping under the driveway membrane, causing problems. Water is also filtrating between the two unsealed membranes and leaking into the mall, and water is seeping under the Giant Planter membrane and causing leaks to occur as well.
Mrs. Fitzpatrick then went on to explain that she and Walter Gorman’s associates had been working diligently to effectuate the repairs to the upper plaza areas at the entrances of tower I and the adjacent areas. She stated that these repairs were being done to the satisfaction of the engineer, and appeared to be passing successive water tests. In order to fully explain the problem and address the need to accept the proposal to repair the Giant Planters, she gave a bit of history by stating that when she arrived at the building, the first and most obvious conclusion to draw was that Flag and not properly executed the work. Upon investigation and discussions with Flag and Walter Gorman’s office it appears that Flag may not have received proper direction from the Galaxy. Investigation further reveals that Flag was not provided with drawings from an engineer, and was directed to install a membrane and termination bar system despite the fact that Flag alleges to have told Galaxy representatives at the time that such as system would not be the most effective way to go.
Stating that Flag was now correcting certain deficiencies in their work, to her satisfaction as well as Walter Gorman’s satisfaction, Mrs. Fitzpatrick added that Flag Restoration had been paid all but approximately $57,000 on a job that cost $1,200,000. She pointed out that it would be easy for Flag to walk away from the Galaxy. Citing the fact that she needed to keep them here, and citing the fact that they had installed the Siplast membrane in the driveway, she asked the Board to consider a proposal for Flag to effectuate the repairs to all of the Giant Planters in the plaza area.
Members of the Board queried Mrs. Fitzpatrick about her reasons for not using a different contractor. Mrs. Fitzpatrick stated unequivocally that to bring another contractor in at this point to effectuate this repair would be disastrous, because if there were any problems in the future, each contractor would point a finger at the other. She further stated that if another contractor was brought in, she fully anticipated receiving formal notice from Flag that they were “washing their hands of this.” She argued that the warranty on the roofing system was in danger of being voided by another contractor if a mistake is made, and strongly suggested that Flag be the contractor to be solely responsible for the entire job.
She concluded her request by stating that Flag’s scope of work would be prepared by Walter Gorman’s office, reviewed by Siplast, and would be overseen by an engineer every step of the way to ensure that it is done properly. She added that that with the increased levels of supervision that are now at The Galaxy, there would be little room for failure.
Mr. Eastmond was strongly opposed to this request. He stated that he thought that Flag Restoration had failed the Galaxy when the flashing repairs to the upper plaza were not properly effectuated, and that he had no faith that this contractor would do quality work.
Mr. Baruch called for a motion to approve the proposal from Flag Restoration dated December 16, 2002. Mrs. Fitzpatrick added quickly that the contractor had advised her that the Giant Planters had never been exposed and that a 30% contingency should be added to the price to account for unanticipated conditions once the dirt is removed and the planters are opened.
On a motion made by Dennis Squitieri and seconded by Joel Price, the Board voted to accept the proposal from Flag, subject to the provision of a contract to be drawn up by Mr. Buckalew, and subject to the fact that Flag contractually agrees to protect and maintain the existing driveway work that has been done.
(Baruch, Blank, Ellinger, Squitieri: for; Eastmond: opposed; Gulrajaney, Price: abstained)
As a result of the high regard for the work that Fisher Harris Shapiro effectuated with regard to the procurement of the insurance policies, on a motion made by Dennis Squitieri and seconded by Joel Price, the Directors voted unanimously to accept a proposal dated December 21, 2002 from Fisher Harris Shapiro to retain them to provide risk management and insurance procurement services for the 2003-2004 season.
Conversion of Garage & Transportation Comm. to Transportation and Garage Security Committee
Mrs. Fitzpatrick explained that she had suggested this change, and had discussed it with Sari Zuckerman, because she felt that the assignment of parking spaces and the review of receipts (a duty that was being carried out by the Committee) belonged within the framework of Management and the Financial Advisory Committee. She also stated that she had asked Scott Rozman to perform an audit of the billing and receipts for the garage. She concluded by stating that the committee requests a set of reports from the Comptroller, which is creating an unnecessary backlog of work in the Comptroller’s office, and a race to meet the deadlines of the committee, which are difficult to follow and unnecessary for the proper operation of the system. .
On a motion made by Dennis Squitieri and seconded by Chad Gulrajaney, the Board voted unanimously to change the Garage and Transportation Committee to the Transportation and Garage Security Committee.
Resolution to memorialize the Resolution of November 21st regarding the application for a repair and restoration loan.
Mr. Blank introduced an issue to the Board by stating that there were three key issues requiring resolution in connection with the directive of Resolution #6, regarding the vote for a Recreational Activities Chairperson that is made by each Club Manager. He stated that the conflict revolved around the following three main issues:
1) If a club is deemed inactive, what constitutes inactivity? Mr. Blank went on to explain that there was an issue in which a certain club was perceived to be defunct due to inactivity, thus precluding the Club Manager from voting.
2) Can two people run for the committee chair as a slate?
3) Were the two people who ran as a slate actually eligible to run, and/or are they eligible to be in the committee in the first place, because neither of them are a club manager?
On a motion made by Chad Gulrajaney and seconded by Joel Price, the Board moved unanimously to direct that the petition be given to Mr. Buckalew to review and advise the Board at a later date. Manager’s Report
The Open Session Concluded at 11:40pm.
The meeting then proceeded to Executive Session.